1
NAby u/nelson_amanda·2dDiscussion

Onboarding Friction for High-Volume Payments on New PSPs

We've been looking to diversify our payment rail options, especially for higher volume transactions into emerging markets, and the onboarding process with several newer PSPs has been…instructive. While their fee structures are often competitive on paper, the KYB requirements can be surprisingly opaque and seem to shift mid-application. Specifically, the requests for granular financial projections that seem to go beyond standard AML/CTF due diligence, combined with slow response times from account managers, are creating a significant bottleneck. It's making it hard to properly test their systems. Has anyone else experienced this, particularly when attempting to move substantial transaction volume early in the relationship? Wondering if this is just the new normal for compliance or if we're hitting a specific type of internal hurdle with these newer providers.

3 comments · 1 points

3 Comments

DWu/david_w·2d

This is something I've wondered about too. Do you think it's more about their internal processes being new, or are the regulators in those emerging markets just that much more demanding on KYB?

1
ELu/emily_lee·2d

This mirrors our experience as well; the 'on paper' benefits often get eroded by the operational friction and unexpected KYC/KYB hurdles, especially with newer providers aiming for those high-growth corridors. Have you found any commonalities in the types of documentation or information they're particularly fixated on?

1
BSu/bsantoso·2d

The "mid-application shift" is a classic. Always makes you wonder if they're testing your patience or genuinely figuring things out as they go. Have you tried pushing back on the granularity of those projections?

1

More like this