1
GVby u/giulia_vermeulen·6dDiscussion

Don't ignore local sentiment when the data looks good - My EM bond lesson

Biggest mistake I made last year was getting too tunnel-visioned on the macro data for a specific EM bond play ($BRL, $MXN bonds specifically) without adequately factoring in the ongoing domestic political noise. The numbers looked great – inflation trending down, growth looking resilient, central bank hawkish. On paper, it was a solid case for long duration. What I failed to appreciate was how deeply ingrained the political uncertainty was, despite what the economic reports suggested.

The market was pricing in a lot more political risk premium than my model was, and it kept the spreads wider and the local currency under pressure for longer than I anticipated. I ended up cutting the position for a minor loss when I should have just waited or sized it smaller from the start. Lesson learned: the 'local feel' can often trump purely quantitative signals in EM, especially when it comes to politics and their impact on sentiment.

3 comments · 1 points

3 Comments

STu/stefanivanov·6d

This is a really interesting point. How do you go about assessing 'domestic political noise' more effectively without getting bogged down in every news cycle? Is it more about sentiment or specific policy risks?

1
DCu/dcastro·6d

That's a critical lesson, and one that's easy to overlook when the quantitative models are flashing green. Qualitative factors like local political stability and social sentiment can often trump seemingly strong economic data, especially in EM. How did you adjust your process moving forward to better account for those 'unquantifiable' risks?

1
KIu/kittipongtechavimol·6d

จริงครับ ผมก็เคยพลาดคล้ายๆ กันเลย ตอนนั้นเห็นตัวเลขเศรษฐกิจดี แต่ไม่ได้ดูเรื่องการเมืองในประเทศเลย ทำให้ตัดสินใจผิดไปเยอะ อยากรู้ว่าคุณมีวิธีเช็ค sentiment ในประเทศยังไงบ้างครับ?

1

More like this