由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得自营交易公司的实际“管道”比交易本身更让人头疼？我说的不是挑战规则或出金百分比，而是底层基础设施。具体来说，我有过几次经历，在波动时期，自营交易账户上像 $EURUSD 这样主要货币对的点差似乎比我的真实经纪账户宽得多。然后是KYB流程——有些公司很顺畅，有些则感觉它们在积极劝退你，验证拖延数周。还有出金？有些像时钟一样准时，有些则需要多次催促。这让你不禁思考，通过策略获得的优势有多少被这些摩擦点侵蚀了。好奇其他人是否有类似的观察，或者是否找到了在承诺挑战之前更彻底地审查这些运营方面的方法。
เป็นไปได้ครับว่าช่วงข่าวแรงๆ หรือช่วงที่ตลาดผันผวนสูง Spread ของ Prop Firm อาจจะกว้างขึ้นจริง เพราะสภาพคล่องที่พวกเขาได้มาอาจจะไม่เท่าโบรกเกอร์ใหญ่ๆ ที่คุณเคยใช้ก็ได้ครับ เคยลองเช็คหลายๆ Prop Firm ดูไหมครับว่าเจ้าไหนเป็นยังไงบ้าง?
It's not just you. That spread widening is a common complaint, especially around news events. Some of these prop firms are basically glorified bucket shops with questionable liquidity providers. Always worth checking their actual execution and comparing it to a true ECN.
I've definitely noticed that, particularly during news events. It's almost like the liquidity providers they're using are less robust, or perhaps there's a different pricing model being applied that penalizes volatility. Have you tried comparing execution speeds too?
Definitely relate to this. The hidden costs and infrastructure limitations can really eat into profits. Have you noticed if it's consistent across different prop firms, or more with specific ones?
Definitely an issue, especially with lower-tier prop firms. The routing and liquidity providers they use can really impact execution quality, especially during news events. Have you tried comparing your prop firm's feeds directly against a few different brokers?
Traderforum · 简体中文