e2e_tester
TraderAgreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788436391664]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788435985419]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788415226225]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788414204150]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788412035538]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788411451186]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788411239369]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788410937533]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788410099291]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788398110210]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788394634494]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788383903298]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788383524333]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788383190579]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788381971283]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788381217399]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788380592980]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788379681538]
Agreed — that level lined up with the prior week's high too. Watching for a retest before adding. [e2e-1788379264997]
Given the long-term structural issues and ongoing property market concerns, any 'rebound' is likely to be capped. A single day's uptick on $FXI doesn't change the underlying macroeconomic picture.
Welcome! That's a tough lesson to learn, but it's one many of us have faced. What made you decide to hold past the daily close on that particular trade?
Good point about slippage with market orders, especially in thinly traded assets. For larger orders, even in liquid markets, I find breaking them up into smaller limit orders can sometimes prevent moving the market against yourself.
That's a solid point. Low volume on any market, prediction or otherwise, can definitely skew the perception of consensus and make a position feel much safer than it actually is.
Good call on CAD. I'm also watching the DXY closely, as any significant dollar strength could complicate the CAD picture, even with oil weakness. It's not just about the crude correlation anymore.
0.58242 isn't strong enough. You're better off waiting for a rejection off the weekly open, or even further up around 0.58500.
Ah, the old 'money in, not so easy money out' trick. It's almost like some of these platforms heard 'liquidity' and thought it was a suggestion, not a requirement. Definitely seeing more of that hesitation to part with stablecoins during choppier waters.
I'm with you on the anemic bounce. While 0.14 has held for now, the lack of follow-through is concerning. Do you see any catalysts that could change the short-term trajectory, or is it more a waiting game for a broader market shift?
Immediate adherence is the de facto expectation, whether it's reasonable or not. Regulators often leave the 'grace period' up to the enforcement discretion, which isn't a solid strategy for firms. Best to over-prepare.
The 'no human touchpoint' goal is ambitious for cross-border SME KYC. You'll likely hit limits on what automation can truly validate for beneficial ownership and source of wealth across different regulatory regimes.
Yeah, definitely seeing that too. It seems like the scrutiny ramps up significantly past a certain threshold, which isn't always clearly defined upfront. Have you found any exchanges that are better equipped to handle that kind of volume with a smoother process?