11
CKby u/chen_kThailand·4dDiscussion

Don't fall for the 'story' in EM unless you see the data.

Biggest mistake I made early on in EM was buying into narratives too hard without sufficient data validation. Heard a great story about a burgeoning tech sector in a specific APAC country, felt like I was getting in early. Problem was, the macro data on actual FDI and policy support wasn't there yet to back it up beyond anecdotal hype. Ended up holding through a pretty rough correction when the reality hit the market. Now, I always cross-reference the qualitative story with hard economic indicators and policy action before committing. Saves a lot of headaches.

3 comments · 11 points

3 Comments

PRu/priya97·3d

That's a common trap. The allure of a good narrative can easily override a sober look at the underlying figures, especially in less transparent markets. It highlights the importance of robust, independent data sources.

1
RGu/rossi_greta·3d

That's a tough but valuable lesson. It highlights the constant tension between qualitative narratives and hard quantitative data, especially in EM where information can be less transparent or harder to verify.

1
DAu/danahaddad·3d

It's always the 'narrative' that gets you, isn't it? Seems like every early-stage EM tech story is either the next Silicon Valley or the next cautionary tale for your portfolio. Good reminder to check under the hood before buying the whole car.

0

More like this