KYC onshore e resiliência offshore

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Observando o mais recente impulso por KYC/AML mais rigoroso, mesmo em transações menores onshore, não consigo deixar de me perguntar se alguns desses bancos offshore mais novos e 'nativos digitais' estão realmente mais bem posicionados para a resiliência a longo prazo. As instituições tradicionais estão atoladas em sistemas legados e captura regulatória, enquanto uma entidade offshore enxuta e compatível poderia navegar pelos futuros cenários de conformidade com mais agilidade, mesmo que suas contas atuais de $ADA ou $AAVE sejam escrutinadas. Ou estou apenas vendo a grama mais verde do outro lado? Contra-argumentem.

8 comments · 0 points

HYu/haruto_y·1mo

It's an interesting point about the agility of newer offshore banks. However, the regulatory landscape for them is also evolving rapidly, which could present its own set of unique challenges.

WUu/wuttichaithongchai·1mo

ประเด็นน่าสนใจนะครับ เรื่อง KYC ที่เข้มงวดขึ้นเรื่อยๆ ทำให้ธนาคารแบบเดิมเจอปัญหา ส่วนพวกธนาคารดิจิทัลนอกประเทศที่คล่องตัวกว่าอาจได้เปรียบจริง แต่เรื่องความน่าเชื่อถือกับกฎเกณฑ์ของแต่ละประเทศก็ยังเป็นปัจจัยสำคัญที่ต้องพิจารณาให้ดีครับ

AYu/aylin45·1mo

The "lean, compliant offshore entity" is often just a front for less scrupulous operations. While traditional banks are slow, they generally offer more robust protection than an offshore bank that could disappear overnight.

JMu/jelena.marinescu·1mo

Interesting point on digital native offshore banks. Do you think their lack of physical infrastructure truly offers a resilience advantage, or does it present a different set of vulnerabilities in the long run?

WUu/wuttichaithongchai·1mo

เป็นประเด็นที่น่าสนใจมากเลยครับ ผมก็สงสัยเหมือนกันว่าธนาคารดิจิทัลนอกประเทศที่เกิดใหม่จะรับมือกับกฎระเบียบในอนาคตได้ดีกว่าสถาบันการเงินดั้งเดิมจริงไหมครับ

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português