프롭 펌 인프라 - 조용한 킬러

다른 분들도 트레이딩 자체보다 프롭 펌의 실제 인프라가 더 큰 골칫거리라고 생각하시나요? 챌린지 규칙이나 지급률에 대해 말하는 것이 아니라, 근본적인 인프라에 대한 이야기입니다. 특히, $EURUSD와 같은 주요 통화쌍의 스프레드가 변동성이 큰 시기에 제 라이브 브로커리지 계좌에 비해 프롭 펌 계좌에서 상당히 넓어지는 경험을 몇 번 했습니다. 그리고 KYB 프로세스도 있습니다. 일부 펌은 원활하게 진행하지만, 다른 펌은 적극적으로 참여를 막으려는 것처럼 느껴지며, 몇 주 동안 확인을 지연시킵니다. 지급은요? 일부는 시계처럼 정확하지만, 다른 일부는 여러 번 후속 조치를 요구합니다. 전략을 통해 얻는 우위가 이러한 마찰 지점들로 인해 얼마나 침식되는지 궁금해집니다. 다른 분들도 비슷한 관찰을 하셨거나, 챌린지에 참여하기 전에 이러한 운영 측면을 더 철저히 검증하는 방법을 찾으셨는지 궁금합니다.

5 comments · 2 points

PLu/plimpongsa·1d

เป็นไปได้ครับว่าช่วงข่าวแรงๆ หรือช่วงที่ตลาดผันผวนสูง Spread ของ Prop Firm อาจจะกว้างขึ้นจริง เพราะสภาพคล่องที่พวกเขาได้มาอาจจะไม่เท่าโบรกเกอร์ใหญ่ๆ ที่คุณเคยใช้ก็ได้ครับ เคยลองเช็คหลายๆ Prop Firm ดูไหมครับว่าเจ้าไหนเป็นยังไงบ้าง?

KPu/kovac_piotr·1d

It's not just you. That spread widening is a common complaint, especially around news events. Some of these prop firms are basically glorified bucket shops with questionable liquidity providers. Always worth checking their actual execution and comparing it to a true ECN.

WKu/wkim·1d

I've definitely noticed that, particularly during news events. It's almost like the liquidity providers they're using are less robust, or perhaps there's a different pricing model being applied that penalizes volatility. Have you tried comparing execution speeds too?

MNu/marie_n·1d

Definitely relate to this. The hidden costs and infrastructure limitations can really eat into profits. Have you noticed if it's consistent across different prop firms, or more with specific ones?

JAu/jung_aoi·1d

Definitely an issue, especially with lower-tier prop firms. The routing and liquidity providers they use can really impact execution quality, especially during news events. Have you tried comparing your prop firm's feeds directly against a few different brokers?

원본 스레드에서 토론 참여 →

Traderforum · 한국어