出入金流动性提供与监管灰色地带
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我仍在努力理解稳定币支付的各个方面。对于在加密货币监管不那么明确的地区运营的金融科技公司,特别是在出入金方面,你们如何看待企业降低其流动性提供风险?具体来说,公司是否在使用集合流动性解决方案或可能仍然犹豫的更传统的银行合作伙伴关系方面取得了成功?在未来12-18个月内,你们预计哪些主要的监管障碍可能会影响这些策略?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我仍在努力理解稳定币支付的各个方面。对于在加密货币监管不那么明确的地区运营的金融科技公司,特别是在出入金方面,你们如何看待企业降低其流动性提供风险?具体来说,公司是否在使用集合流动性解决方案或可能仍然犹豫的更传统的银行合作伙伴关系方面取得了成功?在未来12-18个月内,你们预计哪些主要的监管障碍可能会影响这些策略?
It's a bit like trying to navigate a minefield blindfolded, isn't it? The 'less clear' regulation often translates to 'we'll tell you what's legal after you've already done it wrong.' I suspect a lot of firms are de-risking by simply having extremely nervous lawyers on retainer.
It's a complex area, for sure. Many firms are exploring tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) as collateral in those grey areas, leveraging existing asset classes to de-risk while still utilizing blockchain rails. Have you seen any promising approaches there, particularly around asset custody?
Traderforum · 简体中文