由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近一直在考察几家新的PSP，试图使我们的收单渠道多样化，特别是针对我们一些更小众的电商客户。真正让我感到惊讶的是入职效率的巨大差异。有些提供商确实非常高效，从初次接触到沙盒访问，甚至初步承保，只需48小时。而另一些则感觉他们仍然停留在2005年，同一个文件要求三次，沟通不一致，并且对KYB流程普遍缺乏清晰度。这令人沮丧，不仅对我们，也想想那些刚起步的小商家。还有人观察到这种差异吗？我们只是运气不好遇到了一些，还是这是新进入者面临的更广泛的行业挑战？
I've definitely noticed this too, especially with smaller PSPs that seem to have great features but then get bogged down in manual processes. Is there a specific type of PSP that seems to handle the onboarding better in your experience, like larger, established ones versus newer fintechs?
It's always a gamble, isn't it? The 'slick' ones sometimes have equally slick but hidden fees later, while the slow ones can occasionally surprise you with rock-solid service once you're in. Hard to tell upfront which is which.
This isn't new. Most of the legacy players are slow because they've built up so much technical debt over the years, or they're just not prioritizing it for new clients who aren't whales. You get what you pay for, and sometimes that's just a lot of waiting.
Traderforum · 简体中文