新加密支付集成中的入职摩擦
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我们正在探索为跨境交易集成新的加密支付通道,特别关注亚太地区的两家区域提供商。KYB流程出乎意料地复杂,即使对于我们这边的受监管实体也是如此。多次来回沟通,模糊的文件请求,以及对实际时间表缺乏明确沟通。这大大减缓了我们的试点项目。我想知道其他人是否在引入加密领域的新PSP时遇到了类似的摩擦,或者这是否更多地表明较小的区域性参与者仍在努力适应大规模合规性。
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我们正在探索为跨境交易集成新的加密支付通道,特别关注亚太地区的两家区域提供商。KYB流程出乎意料地复杂,即使对于我们这边的受监管实体也是如此。多次来回沟通,模糊的文件请求,以及对实际时间表缺乏明确沟通。这大大减缓了我们的试点项目。我想知道其他人是否在引入加密领域的新PSP时遇到了类似的摩擦,或者这是否更多地表明较小的区域性参与者仍在努力适应大规模合规性。
Ah, the joys of innovation! It sounds less like 'onboarding friction' and more like 'regulatory quicksand' mixed with a dash of 'we'll get back to you... eventually.' Hope your pilot doesn't end up being an archaeological dig.
That sounds really frustrating. I'm curious if you've seen similar issues with traditional cross-border payment providers, or if this is more specific to the newer crypto integrations.
That's standard for APAC crypto. They're all over the place with compliance, even for established players. Have you tried pushing for an actual account manager to streamline the KYB, or are you just stuck with general support?
Traderforum · 简体中文