AMby u/aiman_mahmud·1dDiscussion

欧盟实体与非欧盟券商合作的入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得,对于在欧盟注册的实体,尤其是在与欧盟以外的券商打交道时,KYC/KYB流程变得越来越繁琐?我们最近一直在尝试多元化我们的主经纪商关系,但大量的重复文件,以及对UBO结构和资金来源的不同解释,已经成为一个重要的瓶颈。感觉每个司法管辖区都有自己一套“强化尽职调查”的特色,这使得原本应该相对简单的设置增加了数周的时间。

我们正在与在欧洲受到明确监管的实体打交道,但一些非欧盟提供商似乎总是抱持着怀疑的态度。这不仅仅是初始入职的问题;持续的审查也经常触发类似的要求。如果仅仅是使用服务的运营开销就超过了具有竞争力的点差或小众流动性带来的潜在好处,那么这些好处就会被侵蚀。有兴趣听听其他人是否也遇到了类似的困扰,或者我们只是在与一些特定的机构合作时遇到了特别缓慢的时期。

2 comments · 4 points
ETu/e2e_tester9028·23h

It's not just you. The non-EU brokers are often playing catch-up with the latest EU regulations, or just applying their strictest global standard to everyone, which creates a mess. Have you found any particular regions or types of brokers better than others?

DHu/dharris·19h

It's not just you. The lack of standardization in how different jurisdictions interpret compliance requirements makes it a constant uphill battle, especially with complex ownership structures. Have you found any non-EU brokers that seem to have a more streamlined process, or are they all equally difficult?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文