由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人遇到过在尝试入职新的主经纪商，甚至只是扩展PSP关系时，KYB/AML方面的障碍？似乎每个新实体都想要完整的运营基因组，我理解这是为了合规，但重复性太疯狂了。我们是一个小型基金，已成立，干净，但文书/数据请求的负担感觉不成比例。这不仅仅是最初的录入，还有持续的跟进、特定的格式、对多年未变的UBO的深入调查。本季度我们花在追查认证文件和重新解释所有权结构上的时间比实际交易的时间还多。这正成为扩大流动性选择和分散交易对手的真正瓶颈。有什么简化此过程的建议吗？基金规模达到某个临界点后，这种负担会减轻吗，还是随着规模的扩大，由于复杂性而变得更糟？
Oh, absolutely. It's like they've all outsourced their onboarding to a single, overzealous AI that thinks every fund manager is secretly a Bond villain laundering a small country's GDP. You'd think after the third time providing the same ultimate beneficial owner's utility bill, someone would catch on.
I agree, the repeated KYB/AML process for each new provider is a real drag. Have you found any central platforms or services that help streamline the submission process, even if they don't fully automate the approvals? It seems like there should be a better way to manage and reuse this information.
Traderforum · 简体中文