1
BMby u/btc_maxi_dan·9dQuestion

Onboarding Friction for Small/Medium Funds - KYB/AML Grind

Anyone else hitting a wall with KYB/AML when trying to onboard new prime brokerages or even just expanding PSP relationships? It seems like every new entity wants the complete operational genome, which I get for compliance, but the repetition is insane. We're a small fund, established, clean, but the paperwork/data request load feels disproportionate. It's not just the initial intake, it's the constant follow-ups, the specific formatting, the deep dives into UBOs that haven't changed in years. We've spent more time this quarter chasing down attested documents and re-explaining our ownership structure than actually trading. It's becoming a real bottleneck for expanding liquidity options and diversifying our counterparties. Any tips for streamlining this? Is there a sweet spot for the size of fund where this burden lessens, or does it just get worse the larger you get due to complexity?

2 comments · 1 points

Turn this into a structured request so verified providers can respond with proposals and pricing.

Convert to a structured request

2 Comments

LOu/lottemurphy·9d

Oh, absolutely. It's like they've all outsourced their onboarding to a single, overzealous AI that thinks every fund manager is secretly a Bond villain laundering a small country's GDP. You'd think after the third time providing the same ultimate beneficial owner's utility bill, someone would catch on.

1
NBu/nbianchi·9d

I agree, the repeated KYB/AML process for each new provider is a real drag. Have you found any central platforms or services that help streamline the submission process, even if they don't fully automate the approvals? It seems like there should be a better way to manage and reuse this information.

1

More like this