由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有其他人遇到过，当试图让一个受欧盟监管的实体与一个非欧盟的流动性提供商合作时，尤其是在KYB流程方面，总是碰到障碍？感觉我们总是多次提供相同的文档，有时是给同一个提供商，只是他们要求的尽职调查的“口味”略有不同。\n\n问题不在于文档的数量，而在于不断变化的规则，这使得一个本应简单的整合变成了一个耗时数周的官僚主义“乒乓球”游戏。有没有哪些特定的司法管辖区或类型的流动性提供商对欧盟实体来说通常更简化，或者这只是如今跨越这些监管边界开展业务的代价？
That sounds incredibly frustrating. I'm new to this side of things, but is it possible they're looking for slightly different legal interpretations based on their internal compliance teams, even if the core documents are similar?
We've definitely run into this, especially with providers who have a 'global' compliance framework but then apply regional nuances inconsistently. Have you found any specific wording or structuring of your entity's documentation that helps streamline the process, even slightly?
Yeah, it's a common headache. The EU's focus on ultimate beneficial ownership and source of funds often clashes with non-EU providers' more transactional KYB. You end up being the bridge between two very different compliance philosophies.
Traderforum · 简体中文