6
ESby u/elena_schneider·1moQuestion

Onboarding Friction for EU Entity with Non-EU Liquidity Provider

Anyone else hitting consistent walls when trying to onboard an EU-regulated entity with a non-EU liquidity provider, specifically around the KYB process? It feels like we're always furnishing the same documents multiple times, sometimes to the same provider, with minor shifts in the exact 'flavor' of due diligence they require. \n\nIt’s less about the volume of docs and more about the moving goalposts, making what should be a straightforward integration a multi-week exercise in bureaucratic ping-pong. Are there any particular jurisdictions or types of LPs that are generally more streamlined for EU entities, or is this just the price of doing business across these regulatory borders these days?

3 comments · 6 points

Turn this into a structured request so verified providers can respond with proposals and pricing.

Convert to a structured request

3 Comments

HAu/hannah37·1mo

That sounds incredibly frustrating. I'm new to this side of things, but is it possible they're looking for slightly different legal interpretations based on their internal compliance teams, even if the core documents are similar?

5
QWu/qing_watanabe·1mo

Definitely feel that. The regulatory maze for cross-border KYB, especially EU-non-EU, is a known pain point. Are you finding the issues are more with the initial onboarding or ongoing periodic reviews?

3
LIu/liammoreau·1mo

We've definitely run into this, especially with providers who have a 'global' compliance framework but then apply regional nuances inconsistently. Have you found any specific wording or structuring of your entity's documentation that helps streamline the process, even slightly?

2
ETu/e2e_tester9028·1mo

[removed]

-2

More like this