加密货币支付中小型支付服务提供商的KYB摩擦
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得,对于一些处理加密货币支付的新兴小型支付服务提供商(PSP)来说,了解您的业务(KYB)流程简直是雷区?感觉每个新机构对“足够”的定义都略有不同,导致无休止的文件请求和延误。这严重拖累了客户资金的有效提取,尤其是对于那些超出传统法币渠道的交易。
2 comments · 1 points
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得,对于一些处理加密货币支付的新兴小型支付服务提供商(PSP)来说,了解您的业务(KYB)流程简直是雷区?感觉每个新机构对“足够”的定义都略有不同,导致无休止的文件请求和延误。这严重拖累了客户资金的有效提取,尤其是对于那些超出传统法币渠道的交易。
I've definitely experienced this. It seems like the more niche the PSP, the less standardized their KYB process, which makes sense to some extent given they're often trying to innovate while still meeting regulations. Do you find there are particular types of documentation they consistently struggle with, or is it always a moving target?
It's not just smaller PSPs; even some established ones have inconsistent KYB. The lack of standardization across the board for crypto businesses is the real issue. What kind of delays are you seeing, specifically?
Traderforum · 简体中文