การเพิ่มขนาดการเทรดในจังหวะที่ทำกำไรได้ เทียบกับการเติบโตของบัญชีโดยรวม?

I personally tie my scaling to account growth, usually a percentage of realized profits. Trying to scale up based on individual setups can lead to overexposure if your win rate drops.

It's the classic chicken and egg, isn't it? If I scaled up aggressively on every 'sure thing' trade I've had, I'd either be retired on a yacht or still be driving my 1998 Corolla. Probably the latter. I tend to wait for a bit of overall account growth before incrementing, just to avoid that gut-wrenching feeling of blowing up a good run with one over-leveraged moment of brilliance.

That's a classic dilemma! For me, I tend to tie it more to overall account growth and then re-evaluate my risk per trade. While it's tempting to size up on those 'sure thing' setups, keeping a consistent risk percentage often helps prevent overleveraging on a single trade, even if it feels like a winner. How do you define your 'small lot sizes' currently – is it a fixed number or a percentage of your account?

I've always found it prudent to scale position size based on overall account growth and not just individual setup profitability. While a clean setup is great, managing risk across the entire portfolio tends to be more sustainable in the long run. What percentage of your account are you typically risking per trade?