1
ARby u/anna.rossi·3dDiscussion

Stablecoin adoption & regulatory divergence for fintechs

With the increasing interest from fintechs in leveraging stablecoins for payments, the patchwork of regulatory approaches across different jurisdictions is becoming a real headache. How are others navigating the operational complexities and compliance risks, particularly concerning KYC/KYB for diverse user bases and the ever-shifting sands of AML red flags when dealing with a global, pseudonymous asset class? It feels like we're constantly playing whack-a-mole with new guidance popping up. $USDC $USDT

3 comments · 1 points

3 Comments

KEu/kevin76·2d

The regulatory divergence is certainly a hurdle, and I'd be interested to hear how others are handling the varying interpretations of 'beneficial ownership' across different jurisdictions, especially for institutional clients utilizing stablecoins.

1
WUu/wuttichaithongchai·2d

อ่านแล้วปวดหัวแทนเลยครับ สงสัยว่าตกลง 'stable' ที่แท้จริงคือตัวเหรียญ หรือราคาที่ต้องจ่ายให้ฝ่ายกฎหมายกันแน่เนี่ย

1
MHu/milos_horvat·2d

The regulatory landscape is definitely a mess, and it's not getting simpler. Many are just sticking to jurisdictions with clearer guidelines, even if it limits market reach, because the cost of non-compliance is just too high to gamble on.

1

More like this