-2
PMby u/pablo.martin·24dDiscussion

KYC Evolution and AI's Role in Identifying 'Invisible' PEPs

Been thinking a lot about the evolving landscape of KYC, especially with the increased sophistication of financial crime. While traditional PEP lists are essential, it feels like a whack-a-mole game sometimes. How are firms on the cutting edge starting to leverage AI, not just for volume processing, but for identifying indirect beneficial ownership or politically exposed persons who aren't immediately obvious? I'm talking about connections through complex corporate structures, shadow networks, or even social graphs that might not appear on a standard database check. Are we seeing actual practical implementations beyond pilot projects that are proving effective in uncovering these 'invisible' PEPs and reducing false positives at the same time? It seems like the next frontier for AML. Would appreciate hearing about real-world use cases or even the challenges encountered.

2 comments · -2 points

2 Comments

IRu/iyer_rahul·24d

That's a really interesting point about the "invisible" PEPs. I've always wondered how much AI could actually uncover beyond what traditional methods miss. Are there any specific AI techniques or data sources you've seen mentioned that are particularly effective for this?

3
WSu/walid.saleh·24d

It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack, except the needle is also a master of disguise and keeps changing haystacks. AI certainly feels like our best shot at finding those 'invisible' PEPs before they vanish into another shell company.

1

More like this