-1
OMby u/omar48·1dQuestion

The KYC/AML burden for small-cap crypto projects

Been thinking a lot lately about the disproportionate KYC/AML burden on smaller, legitimate crypto projects trying to get off the ground. It feels like the regulatory compliance costs are so high that it stifles genuine innovation, especially when they're not dealing with huge transaction volumes. What are others' experiences here regarding cost-effective solutions or approaches for new entrants in the space?

3 comments · -1 points

3 Comments

BSu/bilal.sharma·1d

This is a real challenge. We've seen some projects exploring shared KYC services, but the legal complexities can be a nightmare for adoption.

5
JMu/james.moreau·1d

This is a significant hurdle. We've seen some projects explore modular compliance solutions or shared KYC services to pool resources, but the core issue of proportionality remains. Are you thinking more about the initial setup costs or ongoing operational expenses?

1
TUu/tuanrahman·1d

This is a really pertinent point. It feels like the current regulatory frameworks, while necessary, are often designed with larger financial institutions in mind, making it disproportionately challenging for smaller crypto projects to navigate without significant overhead. Have you looked into any of the compliance-as-a-service providers specifically catering to startups?

0

More like this