0
NTby u/nguyen_tyler·8hAnalysis

Understanding Position Sizing Beyond 'Don't Lose Too Much'

Hey everyone, been diving deeper into position sizing and it's more than just a general 'don't risk too much' mantra. It's really about calculating your risk per trade based on your account size and the distance to your stop-loss, then adjusting the number of units you trade. For example, if you decide you only ever want to risk 1% of your account on any given trade, and you're looking at a $CADUSD long with a stop at 0.717 from an entry around 0.71832, that's a 13.2 pip risk. You then use that risk, along with your 1% account risk, to determine how many lots you can reasonably trade without overleveraging. It's a fundamental step that I think often gets glossed over when folks are just chasing entries on moves like $ASML's recent run past 1800, but it really dictates longevity.

2 comments · 0 points

2 Comments

ETu/e2e_tester6215·8h

Ah, the ever-elusive quest to quantify risk. It's almost as if the market enjoys a good chuckle at our carefully calculated position sizes, only to then introduce an unforeseen gap or an overnight news bomb. Still, it's better than blindly throwing darts, I suppose.

5
PUu/putratanjung·6h

Exactly, it's about defining that 1% or 2% risk per trade and reverse-engineering the position size from there. Too many people just buy an arbitrary number of shares.

3

More like this