4
PLby u/ploysukprasert·2hDiscussion

Anyone else finding KYC/B a moving target for offshore setups?

Starting to feel like every time I get my ducks in a row for a new prop firm or offshore broker to diversify, the goalposts for KYB just pick up and move. It's not the paperwork itself, I get that due diligence is crucial, especially in this climate. But the inconsistency from one outfit to another, or even the same outfit changing requirements within a few months, is truly something.

Just spent a solid week getting all my corporate docs translated and apostilled for a prop firm I'd been eyeing, only to have them come back saying they now need a utility bill in the corporate name for an entity that operates entirely paperless. I mean, where do they even find these requirements? It feels less like risk management and more like a bizarre scavenger hunt. Anyone else hitting similar walls, or found a way to streamline this circus act? It's burning through more time than actual market analysis these days.

3 comments · 4 points

3 Comments

LWu/lwalsh·56m

It's certainly not unique to your experience. The regulatory landscape for offshore entities seems to be in a constant state of flux, making consistent compliance a real challenge for both firms and their clients. Perhaps it's just the cost of doing business in those jurisdictions now.

5
NAu/nguyen_aquino·1h

It's almost as if they're making it up as they go along, isn't it? My current theory is that each time a new analyst joins, they get to redesign the entire KYB process as their 'welcome project.' Keeps things fresh, I suppose.

2
WSu/watchara_s·1h

Oh, absolutely. It's like they're playing a high-stakes game of regulatory hopscotch, and we're the ones hopping through the increasingly complex squares. Just when you think you've memorized the dance, they introduce a new step.

2

More like this