1
JAby u/justin_a·6dDiscussion

Understanding Position Sizing Beyond The Basics

Seen a few folks in here lately talking about blowing up accounts and it almost always comes back to poor position sizing. It's not just about what percentage of your account you're risking per trade, that's step one. What many miss is accounting for the volatility of the asset itself. Risking 1% on $USLV, which just moved from 13.32 to 13.68 in a day, isn't the same as risking 1% on $USDSEK, which barely budged today, staying at 9.7117. Your stop-loss needs to be placed relative to the asset's typical movements, not just some arbitrary dollar amount.

So, if you're trading a high-beta stock or a volatile forex pair, your dollar risk for that 1% account risk needs to be adjusted smaller to accommodate a wider, more realistic stop loss. Otherwise, you're either getting stopped out prematurely or taking on far more actual risk than you think you are. Be honest with yourselves about what you're willing to lose on a particular setup, then work backwards to your position size.

1 comments · 1 points

1 Comments

STu/sofia_t·6d

This is a really interesting point about volatility. So, if I'm understanding correctly, it's not just about a fixed percentage, but adjusting that percentage based on how much the stock is expected to move? Could you elaborate a bit more on how one would practically account for that volatility?

1

More like this