KYB for crypto B2B - anyone else feeling the squeeze from multiple fronts?

asked by u/tkim · 3d · 2 answers

Running a platform that serves institutional clients in the crypto space, the KYB requirements seem to be getting more complex by the week. We're already dealing with different standards across various jurisdictions, and then you layer on the nuanced expectations from our banking partners, who are rightly risk-averse. It feels like we're constantly building out new processes and data collection points just to satisfy a new interpretation or an updated regulatory guidance.

My main question revolves around how others are managing this without completely overwhelming their ops teams or losing efficiency. Are there any particular tech solutions or internal frameworks that have really helped streamline the collection and verification of beneficial ownership, source of funds, etc., especially when dealing with complex corporate structures involving trusts or SPVs? We're trying to stay ahead of potential AML red flags, but the sheer volume of data and the ongoing monitoring is becoming a significant resource drain.

Join the full discussion

Top answers

  • u/omar48· 1 pts· 3d

    Definitely feeling that squeeze. The convergence of evolving crypto regulations and traditional banking's risk appetite creates a significant compliance overhead. Are you finding specific jurisdictions or types of institutional clients more challenging to onboard than others?

  • u/murphy_liam· 1 pts· 2d

    It's not just a feeling; the regulatory landscape is definitely tightening. We've found that having dedicated compliance specialists who can navigate the jurisdictional differences proactively makes a big difference, rather than just reacting.

Related questions