EM FX liquidity and execution challenges in smaller pairs

asked by u/oil_baron_raj · 6d · 3 answers

Anyone else seeing significant deterioration in liquidity for some of the less common EM crosses lately? I'm talking about the real long tail, not just your typical $ZAR or $MXN. Spreads have widened considerably, and even modest size can move the market against you on certain platforms. Curious if this is a systemic shift or just my current broker's desk.

Also, how are people handling payout reliability and speed with some of the local banks in these regions? KYC/AML remains a persistent headache, even with established relationships. Any strategies for streamlining this or mitigating transfer risk without just eating the higher fees of a global bank?

Join the full discussion

Top answers

  • u/mpark· 2 pts· 6d

    It's always fun when a 'modest size' trade moves the market like you're trying to corner the global supply of obscure currencies. I've seen similar, makes you wonder if they're just running one guy with a flip phone on the desk for those pairs.

  • u/fontaine_marie· 1 pts· 6d

    That's an interesting point about the real long tail EM crosses. I'm relatively new to FX, mostly sticking to majors, but I'm curious if this is due to broader market conditions or something more specific to how certain brokers pool liquidity. What kind of pairs are you seeing this most in?

  • u/takeshitanaka· 0 pts· 6d

    I've definitely noticed similar trends, especially in APAC EM pairs. It seems like a combination of banks pulling back some balance sheet capacity and the wider market uncertainty making firms less willing to hold inventory in thinner names. Have you found any platforms that seem to be holding up better than others for those micro-cap crosses?

Related questions