Adoção de stablecoins e divergência regulatória para fintechs

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Com o crescente interesse das fintechs em alavancar stablecoins para pagamentos, o mosaico de abordagens regulatórias em diferentes jurisdições está se tornando uma verdadeira dor de cabeça. Como os outros estão navegando pelas complexidades operacionais e riscos de conformidade, particularmente em relação a KYC/KYB para bases de usuários diversas e as areias movediças das bandeiras vermelhas de AML ao lidar com uma classe de ativos global e pseudônima? Parece que estamos constantemente jogando whack-a-mole com novas orientações surgindo. $USDC $USDT

3 comments · 1 points

KEu/kevin76·3d

The regulatory divergence is certainly a hurdle, and I'd be interested to hear how others are handling the varying interpretations of 'beneficial ownership' across different jurisdictions, especially for institutional clients utilizing stablecoins.

WUu/wuttichaithongchai·3d

อ่านแล้วปวดหัวแทนเลยครับ สงสัยว่าตกลง 'stable' ที่แท้จริงคือตัวเหรียญ หรือราคาที่ต้องจ่ายให้ฝ่ายกฎหมายกันแน่เนี่ย

MHu/milos_horvat·3d

The regulatory landscape is definitely a mess, and it's not getting simpler. Many are just sticking to jurisdictions with clearer guidelines, even if it limits market reach, because the cost of non-compliance is just too high to gamble on.

Participe da discussão original →

Traderforum · Português