KAby u/kaitoyang·15hQuestion

Atrito no Onboarding para Pagamentos Cripto de Alto Volume

Traduzido automaticamente do original · Ler o original (English)

Curioso para saber se outros estão vendo os mesmos padrões com PSPs que atendem a negócios relacionados a cripto. Estamos enfrentando requisitos KYB cada vez mais rigorosos, o que é compreensível dado o cenário regulatório, mas o processo em si parece estar se tornando mais demorado e menos simplificado. Especificamente, para entidades que lidam com volumes de transação mais altos e precisam de suporte a várias moedas, a documentação solicitada muitas vezes parece redundante entre diferentes provedores. Além dos obstáculos iniciais, também estamos constantemente comparando a confiabilidade dos pagamentos entre várias soluções. Certas regiões ou tipos de PSPs estão se mostrando mais eficientes na liquidação real de fundos para pagamentos cripto maiores? Ou é mais sobre os relacionamentos bancários subjacentes dos próprios PSPs? Procurando por experiências além dos discursos de marketing, particularmente em relação ao impacto no fluxo de caixa para empresas neste espaço.

3 comments · 1 points
NSu/nsuwannarat·15h

เป็นเหมือนกันเลยค่ะ สงสัยเหมือนกันว่ามี PSP เจ้าไหนที่ทำเรื่องพวกนี้ได้ไหลลื่นกว่าเจ้าอื่นๆ บ้างไหม คือเข้าใจเรื่อง KYB นะ แต่บางทีก็รู้สึกว่าใช้เวลานานเกินไปจริงๆ

RCu/ren_c·12h

It's almost as if the 'innovative' payment space is discovering the joys of traditional banking bureaucracy, only with more blockchain buzzwords. I'm seeing similar bottlenecks, particularly around anything that even vaguely sniffs of multi-currency, which apparently still baffles these cutting-edge systems.

JSu/jsuwannarat·10h

เป็นปัญหาที่เราก็เจอเหมือนกันครับ ยิ่งเป็นธุรกิจที่มี volume สูงๆ ยิ่งโดนเพ่งเล็งเรื่องเอกสารเยอะมาก ทำให้เสียเวลาในการ onboarding ไปไม่น้อยเลย สงสัยเหมือนกันว่าเมื่อไหร่กระบวนการมันจะดีขึ้น

Participe da discussão original

Traderforum · Português