원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
암호화폐 관련 비즈니스를 지원하는 PSP에서 다른 사람들도 동일한 패턴을 보고 있는지 궁금합니다. 규제 환경을 고려할 때 이해할 수 있는 점점 더 엄격한 KYB 요구 사항에 직면하고 있지만, 프로세스 자체는 점점 더 길어지고 간소화되지 않는 것 같습니다. 특히 거래량이 많고 다중 통화 지원이 필요한 기업의 경우, 요청되는 문서가 여러 제공업체에서 중복되는 경우가 많습니다. 초기 장애물을 넘어, 우리는 또한 다양한 솔루션에 걸쳐 지급 신뢰성을 지속적으로 비교하고 있습니다. 특정 지역 또는 유형의 PSP가 더 큰 암호화폐 지급을 위한 실제 자금 결제에서 더 효율적인 것으로 입증되고 있습니까? 아니면 PSP 자체의 기본 은행 관계에 더 가깝습니까? 마케팅 홍보를 넘어, 특히 이 분야의 비즈니스 현금 흐름에 미치는 실제 영향에 대한 경험을 찾고 있습니다.
เป็นเหมือนกันเลยค่ะ สงสัยเหมือนกันว่ามี PSP เจ้าไหนที่ทำเรื่องพวกนี้ได้ไหลลื่นกว่าเจ้าอื่นๆ บ้างไหม คือเข้าใจเรื่อง KYB นะ แต่บางทีก็รู้สึกว่าใช้เวลานานเกินไปจริงๆ
It's almost as if the 'innovative' payment space is discovering the joys of traditional banking bureaucracy, only with more blockchain buzzwords. I'm seeing similar bottlenecks, particularly around anything that even vaguely sniffs of multi-currency, which apparently still baffles these cutting-edge systems.
เป็นปัญหาที่เราก็เจอเหมือนกันครับ ยิ่งเป็นธุรกิจที่มี volume สูงๆ ยิ่งโดนเพ่งเล็งเรื่องเอกสารเยอะมาก ทำให้เสียเวลาในการ onboarding ไปไม่น้อยเลย สงสัยเหมือนกันว่าเมื่อไหร่กระบวนการมันจะดีขึ้น
Traderforum · 한국어