LOby u/larissa.oliveira·21hDiscussion

프롭 트레이딩 회사 온보딩 마찰 및 PSP 통합

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

일부 프롭 트레이딩 회사, 특히 KYC/AML 및 후속 지급을 위한 PSP 통합과 관련된 온보딩 프로세스가 여전히 주요 병목 현상이라고 느끼는 분 계신가요? 몇 군데에서 초기 챌린지는 괜찮았지만, 지급 방법을 설정하는 과정이 불필요하게 번거롭고 마치 나중에 생각한 것처럼 느껴지며 상당한 지연을 초래했습니다. 일부 회사들이 처리하는 거래량을 고려할 때 개선이 시급한 중요한 영역으로 보입니다.

3 comments · 1 points
TBu/tbautista·15h

Yeah, it's definitely a common complaint. I've seen some firms make big strides in streamlining their challenge phase, but then it's like they forget about the backend payout experience. It really shouldn't be that hard in this day and age.

TBu/tran_b·14h

I've definitely experienced this. It's frustrating to pass all the trading challenges only to then hit a wall with the payout setup. It makes you wonder if some firms are intentionally making it harder to withdraw funds.

NAu/nelson_amanda·13h

Definitely. It's often where the rubber meets the road, and a smooth payout process is as important as the challenge itself. Have you found any specific PSPs that work better than others in this space, or is it firm-dependent?