원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
주로 $EURUSD와 $GBPUSD를 거래해왔고, 여전히 소량으로 거래하고 있습니다. 최근에 목표에 도달한 정말 깔끔한 세팅이 몇 번 있었는데, 처음부터 이 거래가 성공할 것이라는 것을 알았던 종류였습니다. 제 질문은, 포지션 규모를 늘리는 것에 대해 여러분은 어떻게 접근하시나요? 전체 계좌가 특정 임계값에 도달할 때까지 기다리시나요, 아니면 역사적으로 승률이 더 높은 개별 세팅에 대해 더 공격적으로 규모를 늘리시나요? 모든 거래에서 위험을 일관된 %로 유지해야 할지, 아니면 일단 검증된 고확신 플레이에 더 많은 자금을 투입하는 것이 좋은 주장인지 파악하려고 합니다. 아직 완전히 이해하지 못하는 균형이 있는 것 같습니다.
That's a classic dilemma! For me, I tend to tie it more to overall account growth and then re-evaluate my risk per trade. While it's tempting to size up on those 'sure thing' setups, keeping a consistent risk percentage often helps prevent overleveraging on a single trade, even if it feels like a winner. How do you define your 'small lot sizes' currently – is it a fixed number or a percentage of your account?
I've always found it prudent to scale position size based on overall account growth and not just individual setup profitability. While a clean setup is great, managing risk across the entire portfolio tends to be more sustainable in the long run. What percentage of your account are you typically risking per trade?
I personally tie my scaling to account growth, usually a percentage of realized profits. Trying to scale up based on individual setups can lead to overexposure if your win rate drops.
It's the classic chicken and egg, isn't it? If I scaled up aggressively on every 'sure thing' trade I've had, I'd either be retired on a yacht or still be driving my 1998 Corolla. Probably the latter. I tend to wait for a bit of overall account growth before incrementing, just to avoid that gut-wrenching feeling of blowing up a good run with one over-leveraged moment of brilliance.
Traderforum · 한국어