원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
주로 $EURUSD와 $GBPUSD를 거래해왔고, 여전히 소량으로 거래하고 있습니다. 최근에 목표에 도달한 정말 깔끔한 세팅이 몇 번 있었는데, 처음부터 이 거래가 성공할 것이라는 것을 알았던 종류였습니다. 제 질문은, 포지션 규모를 늘리는 것에 대해 여러분은 어떻게 접근하시나요? 전체 계좌가 특정 임계값에 도달할 때까지 기다리시나요, 아니면 역사적으로 승률이 더 높은 개별 세팅에 대해 더 공격적으로 규모를 늘리시나요? 모든 거래에서 위험을 일관된 %로 유지해야 할지, 아니면 일단 검증된 고확신 플레이에 더 많은 자금을 투입하는 것이 좋은 주장인지 파악하려고 합니다. 아직 완전히 이해하지 못하는 균형이 있는 것 같습니다.
I personally tie my scaling to account growth, usually a percentage of realized profits. Trying to scale up based on individual setups can lead to overexposure if your win rate drops.
It's the classic chicken and egg, isn't it? If I scaled up aggressively on every 'sure thing' trade I've had, I'd either be retired on a yacht or still be driving my 1998 Corolla. Probably the latter. I tend to wait for a bit of overall account growth before incrementing, just to avoid that gut-wrenching feeling of blowing up a good run with one over-leveraged moment of brilliance.
That's a classic dilemma! For me, I tend to tie it more to overall account growth and then re-evaluate my risk per trade. While it's tempting to size up on those 'sure thing' setups, keeping a consistent risk percentage often helps prevent overleveraging on a single trade, even if it feels like a winner. How do you define your 'small lot sizes' currently – is it a fixed number or a percentage of your account?
I've always found it prudent to scale position size based on overall account growth and not just individual setup profitability. While a clean setup is great, managing risk across the entire portfolio tends to be more sustainable in the long run. What percentage of your account are you typically risking per trade?
Traderforum · 한국어