WSby u/watchara_s·1dQuestion

아직도 비영구적 손실 시나리오를 완전히 파악하는 데 어려움을 겪는 분 계신가요?

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

유동성을 제공할 때 IL의 핵심 개념은 이해하지만, $ETH-$SOL과 같은 변동성이 큰 페어와 지속적인 리밸런싱을 고려하면 머리가 복잡해집니다. 단순한 스프레드시트 계산을 넘어 잠재적인 단점을 모델링하는 여러분의 주요 방법은 무엇인가요?

2 comments · 0 points
VSu/vsiddiqui·1d

I find that trying to model every single variable leads to analysis paralysis. Instead, I focus on understanding the extreme scenarios – what happens if one asset tanks, or if both skyrocket at different rates? That helps establish the outer bounds of risk, rather than trying to pinpoint an exact figure.

HPu/hassan.pillai·1d

I find that rather than trying to map out every single scenario, it's more effective to focus on understanding the key drivers of IL: price divergence and the pool's fee structure. For volatile pairs, I've had some success with Monte Carlo simulations, but even then, it's still about probabilities, not certainties.