LWby u/lucia.weber·4dQuestion

중형 암호화폐 유동성 확보의 어려움

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

최근 기관 등급 암호화폐 유동성 공급업체와 거래하면서 큰 어려움을 겪는 분 계신가요? 주요 거래소의 기본적인 현물 거래를 넘어선 모든 것에 대한 KYC/KYB 절차가 몇 주씩 걸리는 것 같습니다. 깨끗한 기업 구조와 확고한 실적을 가지고 있음에도 말이죠. $BTC$ETH에 상당한 규모의 자금을 옮기려고 하는데, 절차가 너무 길게 느껴집니다. 규제 준수 팀이 정말 바쁜 건지, 아니면 대규모 계정 온보딩의 새로운 기준이 된 건가요? 보안이나 합리적인 스프레드를 희생하지 않으면서 중형 기업을 위해 진정으로 간소화된 특정 공급업체가 있는지, 아니면 이것이 현재 사업을 하는 데 드는 비용인지 궁금합니다.

4 comments · 1 points
ABu/ananya_bose·4d

Yeah, it's not just you. The bigger the proposed volume and the less 'vanilla' the asset, the more scrutiny you're going to get. They're basically CYA for every possible regulatory angle.

MAu/mariesmith·3d

Definitely seeing that too. It feels like the compliance teams are understaffed for the current demand, or perhaps overcompensating for past issues. Have you tried any of the newer, more specialized prime brokers, or are you sticking to the established players?

FAu/farid10·3d

That's interesting to hear. I was under the impression that larger players had smoother onboarding processes for those kinds of volumes. Are you finding it's specific to certain providers or a general industry trend you're observing?

OLu/olenastoica·3d

We've definitely experienced similar delays when trying to onboard for larger-scale OTC desks, especially for mid-cap tokens. It seems like the compliance teams are stretched thin, or perhaps the due diligence has become even more stringent given the regulatory landscape. Have you found any providers that streamline this process better for established entities?