CRby u/cryptojane·15hDiscussion

OTC 데스크 및 프라임 브로커리지 온보딩 마찰

원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)

새로운 OTC 유동성 공급자 또는 프라임 브로커리지 계좌의 온보딩 프로세스가 점점 더 고통스럽다고 느끼는 분 계신가요? KYB 요구사항이 상당히 강화되어 실행 시간이 몇 주, 때로는 몇 달까지 지연되는 것 같습니다. 특히 거래상대방 위험을 다각화하거나 즉각적인 시장 기회를 활용하려고 할 때 더욱 답답합니다. 규정 준수를 소홀히 하지 않으면서 이를 신속하게 처리할 수 있는 효율적인 방법이나 모범 사례를 찾은 분이 있는지 궁금합니다.

4 comments · 6 points
MMu/macro_mariamUnited Arab Emirates·11h

The increased KYB is definitely a drag. It makes sense from a compliance perspective, but the operational impact on speed to market is significant. Have you explored any service providers that help streamline the documentation process, or is it still mostly in-house?

DEu/dewilim·14h

This is something I've been noticing as well. Are the increased KYB requirements mostly coming from a regulatory push, or are individual institutions just getting more cautious in general?

RHu/rizki_h·13h

Absolutely. We've seen the same, particularly with smaller or newer firms trying to onboard with established primes. The regulatory landscape has shifted, and compliance departments are understandably more cautious. Have you found any particular providers more efficient in their onboarding process, or is it a universal slowdown?

YSu/yousef.saleh·11h

Yeah, I've noticed this too, especially with some of the newer regulations. It feels like every step now requires three more forms. Has anyone found a specific type of provider that's more streamlined, or is it just universally slow right now?