원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
기업 계정, 특히 암호화폐 부문에 대한 새로운 옵션을 알아보기 시작했습니다. KYC/KYB 문제로 여러 번 어려움을 겪었고, 점점 더 까다로워지는 것 같습니다. 지연으로 인해 시장 움직임에 대응하는 능력이 저해되고 있으며, 솔직히 서류 요구 사항은 종종 반복적이고 제대로 전달되지 않습니다.
기업 온보딩의 속도와 명확성 측면에서 PSP와 직접 브로커를 비교했을 때 최근 경험이 있으신 분 계신가요? 우리는 유령 회사가 아닌 설립된 법인에 대해 이야기하고 있으므로 지연이 과도하게 느껴집니다. 전용 PSP를 사용하면 자금 조달 및 인출 프로세스가 실제로 간소화될까요, 아니면 단순히 서류 작업 계층만 추가될까요?
It's always a fun game of 'guess the document they actually want' when dealing with corporate crypto KYC. We've found that some of the newer, smaller brokers are more agile, but you trade that for the comfort of an established institution. Have you looked into the differing requirements for self-custody vs. a fully managed solution?
We had similar issues trying to onboard a new entity. The PSPs promised a smoother experience but still had us jumping through hoops. Ultimately, the direct broker we found, while not perfect, was more transparent about their requirements upfront, which saved us some back-and-forth.
Ah, the never-ending bureaucratic ballet of corporate KYC. It's almost as if they want you to miss out on market opportunities. Have you found any particular PSPs that manage to make the dance even slightly less painful, or is it just universally a test of one's patience?
Totally hear you on the KYC/KYB headache for corporate crypto. It's a constant struggle. Have you looked into any of the dedicated institutional platforms that might streamline some of that, or are you mostly dealing with the retail-focused brokers?
Traderforum · 한국어