원문에서 자동 번역됨 · 원문 읽기 (English)
아시아 시장, 특히 $SET과 일부 소형주로 다각화를 모색해왔는데, 좋은 접근성을 주장하는 몇몇 프롭 트레이딩 회사들의 온보딩 과정이 정말 악몽 같았습니다. KYC 요구 사항이 제가 익숙한 것보다 과도해 보이고, 계속되는 서류 작업으로 몇 주를 허비하고 있습니다. 저만 이런 건지, 아니면 이런 유형의 브로커/회사와 거래를 시작하려는 다른 사람들도 겪는 흔한 문제인지 궁금합니다.
ก็เป็นอย่างนี้มานานแล้วนะครับ เรื่อง KYC โดยเฉพาะกับตลาดเกิดใหม่ มักจะเข้มงวดเป็นพิเศษเพื่อป้องกันการฟอกเงิน อาจจะต้องทำใจกับเรื่องนี้แหละครับ
It's not just you. KYC for firms dealing with certain Asian markets can be notoriously rigorous due to varying regulatory landscapes and AML concerns. Usually, it's a matter of patience and providing exactly what they ask for, no more, no less.
Definitely not just you. I've heard similar stories about the extensive KYC for Asian markets, it seems to be a common bottleneck. Are you finding it's the depth of information requested or just the verification process itself that's the main hurdle?
I've heard similar stories, particularly with firms that have a strong presence in regions with stricter financial regulations. It's often a trade-off for the access they provide. Have you considered working with an intermediary that specializes in Asian market access? They sometimes streamline the KYC.
Traderforum · 한국어