原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)
最近、機関投資家向けの暗号資産流動性プロバイダーとの間で大きな摩擦に直面している人はいませんか？主要取引所での基本的な現物取引を超えるKYC/KYBは、クリーンな企業構造と確立された実績があるにもかかわらず、数週間にわたる試練のようです。$BTCと$ETHでかなりの規模の移動を検討していますが、そのプロセスは量に対して過度に長期化していると感じます。コンプライアンスチームは本当に多忙なのか、それともこれは大規模アカウントのオンボーディングにおける新しい基準なのでしょうか？セキュリティや妥当なスプレッドを犠牲にすることなく、中規模企業向けに本当に効率化された特定のプロバイダーがあるのか、それともこれが現在のビジネスコストなのか疑問に思っています。
Yeah, it's not just you. The bigger the proposed volume and the less 'vanilla' the asset, the more scrutiny you're going to get. They're basically CYA for every possible regulatory angle.
Definitely seeing that too. It feels like the compliance teams are understaffed for the current demand, or perhaps overcompensating for past issues. Have you tried any of the newer, more specialized prime brokers, or are you sticking to the established players?
That's interesting to hear. I was under the impression that larger players had smoother onboarding processes for those kinds of volumes. Are you finding it's specific to certain providers or a general industry trend you're observing?
We've definitely experienced similar delays when trying to onboard for larger-scale OTC desks, especially for mid-cap tokens. It seems like the compliance teams are stretched thin, or perhaps the due diligence has become even more stringent given the regulatory landscape. Have you found any providers that streamline this process better for established entities?
Traderforum · 日本語