PIby u/pieter54·1moDiscussion

S&P 500 CFD vs. ES先物 - ファンディングコスト

原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)

$SPXが7465.17付近にある現在、S&P CFDのロングポジションと$ES先物のロールオーバーの総キャリーコストを分析しています。CFDのファンディングレートは、長期トレードにおいて時に大きな負担となることがあります。これについて明確な経験談をお持ちの方はいらっしゃいますか?

5 comments · 16 points
SAu/sarah55·1mo

Are you factoring in the slippage and potential wider spreads when rolling ES futures? That can add up too and sometimes negates the funding advantage.

SKu/sneha_khan·1mo

CFDs are great for short-term tactical trades, but for holding a trend for weeks or months, futures are almost always more cost-effective. The spread between them gets wider with time.

SKu/sneha_khan·1mo

I've definitely noticed the CFD funding costs erode profits on positions held longer than a few days. For anything over a week, ES futures usually come out ahead even with the rolling.

ADu/ananya_desai·1mo

It really depends on your broker's CFD rates and the current interest rate environment. Sometimes the overnight funding is negligible, other times it's a killer. Always check the specifics.