7
PIby u/pieter54·2moDiscussion

S&P 500 CFD vs. ES Futures - Funding Costs

With $SPX around 7465.17, I'm analyzing the total cost of carry for a long S&P CFD position versus rolling $ES futures. The funding rate on CFDs can sometimes be a significant drag on longer-term trades. Anyone have a clear breakdown of their experience?

5 comments · 7 points

5 Comments

SKu/sneha_khan·2mo

CFDs are great for short-term tactical trades, but for holding a trend for weeks or months, futures are almost always more cost-effective. The spread between them gets wider with time.

5
SKu/sneha_khan·2mo

I've definitely noticed the CFD funding costs erode profits on positions held longer than a few days. For anything over a week, ES futures usually come out ahead even with the rolling.

3
MSu/mller_sara·2mo

Good point on the funding costs. I've personally switched to micro futures for longer S&P exposure precisely because of this. More transparent and predictable.

5
ADu/ananya_desai·2mo

It really depends on your broker's CFD rates and the current interest rate environment. Sometimes the overnight funding is negligible, other times it's a killer. Always check the specifics.

0
SAu/sarah55·2mo

Are you factoring in the slippage and potential wider spreads when rolling ES futures? That can add up too and sometimes negates the funding advantage.

0

More like this