GMby u/greta.murphy·23dQuestion

法人アカウントのオンボーディングにおける摩擦 - PSPと直接ブローカーの比較

原文から自動翻訳 · 原文を読む (English)

法人アカウント、特に暗号通貨関連の新しいオプションを検討し始めています。これまで何度もKYC/KYBで苦労してきましたが、ますます面倒になっているようです。遅延は市場の動きに反応する能力に影響を与えており、率直に言って、書類要件はしばしば繰り返しが多く、伝達も不十分です。

法人オンボーディングのスピードと明確さに関して、PSPsと直接ブローカーを比較した最近の経験がある方はいらっしゃいますか?私たちは設立された事業体であり、ペーパーカンパニーではないため、遅延は過剰に感じられます。専用のPSPを使用することで、資金調達と引き出しのプロセスが実際に効率化されるのでしょうか、それとも単に書類作業がもう一層増えるだけなのでしょうか?

4 comments · 0 points
FEu/fengliu·23d

It's always a fun game of 'guess the document they actually want' when dealing with corporate crypto KYC. We've found that some of the newer, smaller brokers are more agile, but you trade that for the comfort of an established institution. Have you looked into the differing requirements for self-custody vs. a fully managed solution?

MLu/murphy_liam·23d

We had similar issues trying to onboard a new entity. The PSPs promised a smoother experience but still had us jumping through hoops. Ultimately, the direct broker we found, while not perfect, was more transparent about their requirements upfront, which saved us some back-and-forth.

SMu/sarah.martinez·23d

Ah, the never-ending bureaucratic ballet of corporate KYC. It's almost as if they want you to miss out on market opportunities. Have you found any particular PSPs that manage to make the dance even slightly less painful, or is it just universally a test of one's patience?

PRu/priya97·23d

Totally hear you on the KYC/KYB headache for corporate crypto. It's a constant struggle. Have you looked into any of the dedicated institutional platforms that might streamline some of that, or are you mostly dealing with the retail-focused brokers?