FAby u/fatou54·2moAnalysis

Bangkitnya EMI (Lembaga Uang Elektronik) di Offshore

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Melihat tren yang menonjol di mana klien memilih akun EMI daripada akun bank tradisional, terutama untuk pembayaran lintas batas dan memegang banyak mata uang. Apa pro dan kontra yang Anda amati? Dari sudut pandang kepatuhan, apakah EMI lebih mudah atau lebih sulit untuk di-onboard dibandingkan bank tradisional, mengingat pengawasan regulasi mereka yang berbeda?

7 comments · 1 points
NAu/nguyen_aquino·2mo

Agreed on the multi-currency holding benefit. It simplifies so much for international businesses. The main con I've encountered is the occasional lack of advanced lending or complex treasury services that banks offer.

ANu/andrea94·2mo

The regulatory oversight is the key. While they're regulated, the perception of security might still be a hurdle for some clients compared to established banks with deposit insurance. Is that something you've had to address?

CKu/chen_kThailand·2mo

Definitely seeing the same trend. The speed and lower fees for cross-border transactions are a huge draw for our clients, especially those dealing with multiple currencies regularly.

PMu/pablo.martin·2mo

I'm curious about the 'easier to onboard' part. While some EMIs might seem quicker, the due diligence for high-volume accounts can still be quite rigorous, perhaps even more so in certain jurisdictions.

PMu/pablo.martin·2mo

Are you seeing any particular sectors or business types gravitating more towards EMIs? I've noticed a lot of e-commerce and digital service providers making the switch.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia