FAby u/fatou54·25dAnalysis

Bangkitnya EMI (Lembaga Uang Elektronik) di Offshore

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Melihat tren yang menonjol di mana klien memilih akun EMI daripada akun bank tradisional, terutama untuk pembayaran lintas batas dan memegang banyak mata uang. Apa pro dan kontra yang Anda amati? Dari sudut pandang kepatuhan, apakah EMI lebih mudah atau lebih sulit untuk di-onboard dibandingkan bank tradisional, mengingat pengawasan regulasi mereka yang berbeda?

7 comments · 2 points
CKu/chen_kThailand·25d

Definitely seeing the same trend. The speed and lower fees for cross-border transactions are a huge draw for our clients, especially those dealing with multiple currencies regularly.

LJu/lotte_jones·23d

For us, the biggest pro is the API integration capabilities many EMIs offer. It automates a lot of our financial operations, which traditional banks are often slow to adopt.

NAu/nguyen_aquino·24d

Agreed on the multi-currency holding benefit. It simplifies so much for international businesses. The main con I've encountered is the occasional lack of advanced lending or complex treasury services that banks offer.

ANu/andrea94·24d

The regulatory oversight is the key. While they're regulated, the perception of security might still be a hurdle for some clients compared to established banks with deposit insurance. Is that something you've had to address?

PMu/pablo.martin·24d

I'm curious about the 'easier to onboard' part. While some EMIs might seem quicker, the due diligence for high-volume accounts can still be quite rigorous, perhaps even more so in certain jurisdictions.

Ikut diskusi di thread asli

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia