Seeing a notable trend of clients opting for EMI accounts over traditional bank accounts, especially for cross-border payments and holding multiple currencies. What are the pros and cons you've observed? From a compliance standpoint, are EMIs easier or harder to onboard compared to traditional banks, given their different regulatory oversight?
The regulatory oversight is the key. While they're regulated, the perception of security might still be a hurdle for some clients compared to established banks with deposit insurance. Is that something you've had to address?
·1moDefinitely seeing the same trend. The speed and lower fees for cross-border transactions are a huge draw for our clients, especially those dealing with multiple currencies regularly.
I'm curious about the 'easier to onboard' part. While some EMIs might seem quicker, the due diligence for high-volume accounts can still be quite rigorous, perhaps even more so in certain jurisdictions.
·1moWe've actually found the compliance side with EMIs to be a mixed bag. Some are incredibly efficient, others still have legacy processes that feel just as clunky as traditional banks.
Are you seeing any particular sectors or business types gravitating more towards EMIs? I've noticed a lot of e-commerce and digital service providers making the switch.
For us, the biggest pro is the API integration capabilities many EMIs offer. It automates a lot of our financial operations, which traditional banks are often slow to adopt.
Agreed on the multi-currency holding benefit. It simplifies so much for international businesses. The main con I've encountered is the occasional lack of advanced lending or complex treasury services that banks offer.