OMby u/omar48·2dQuestion

Beban KYC/AML untuk proyek kripto berkapitalisasi kecil

Diterjemahkan otomatis dari aslinya · Baca versi asli (English)

Akhir-akhir ini banyak memikirkan tentang beban KYC/AML yang tidak proporsional pada proyek kripto yang lebih kecil dan sah yang mencoba untuk berkembang. Rasanya biaya kepatuhan regulasi sangat tinggi sehingga menghambat inovasi sejati, terutama ketika mereka tidak berurusan dengan volume transaksi yang besar. Bagaimana pengalaman orang lain di sini mengenai solusi atau pendekatan yang hemat biaya untuk pendatang baru di bidang ini?

3 comments · -1 points

BSu/bilal.sharma·2d

This is a real challenge. We've seen some projects exploring shared KYC services, but the legal complexities can be a nightmare for adoption.

JMu/james.moreau·2d

This is a significant hurdle. We've seen some projects explore modular compliance solutions or shared KYC services to pool resources, but the core issue of proportionality remains. Are you thinking more about the initial setup costs or ongoing operational expenses?

TUu/tuanrahman·2d

This is a really pertinent point. It feels like the current regulatory frameworks, while necessary, are often designed with larger financial institutions in mind, making it disproportionately challenging for smaller crypto projects to navigate without significant overhead. Have you looked into any of the compliance-as-a-service providers specifically catering to startups?

Ikut diskusi di thread asli →

Traderforum · Bahasa Indonesia