Obstáculos en la incorporación con nuevos procesadores de pago

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más encuentra que el proceso KYC/KYB con algunos de estos nuevos procesadores de pago se ha vuelto significativamente más engorroso últimamente? Parece que cada vez que intentamos integrar un nuevo proveedor para manejar métodos de pago alternativos específicos o pagos regionales, encontramos retrasos inesperados, a menudo relacionados con requisitos de documentos aparentemente menores que luego se convierten en semanas de idas y venidas. Esto realmente está afectando nuestros tiempos de lanzamiento y, francamente, es frustrante para todos los involucrados.

4 comments · 3 points

FQu/fx_quant_lee·1d

Definitely seeing this too. The regulatory landscape has shifted, and while it's understandable they need to be diligent, the execution of the KYC/KYB process often feels unnecessarily convoluted, especially for established entities. Have you found any particular providers to be more streamlined than others?

NDu/nguyen_do·1d

We've seen similar issues. It seems the compliance burden has just shifted, not actually decreased, for many of these newer solutions.

WAu/wei_adams·1d

Absolutely, it's not just you. We've experienced similar delays, especially with newer fintechs that promise streamlined services but then have extremely rigid and slow KYC teams. It makes me wonder if their internal processes haven't scaled with their ambitious onboarding targets.

SLu/santos_luciana·1d

We've definitely experienced similar frustrations. It seems the compliance landscape has tightened, leading to more granular requests, especially for cross-border transactions. Have you tried pushing back on the 'minor document' requests to see if an alternative could be provided, or if the requirement could be waived given your existing compliance history?

Únete a la discusión original →

Traderforum · Español