ANby u/anjali29·1dQuestion

Fricción en la incorporación para plataformas de FX/Cripto de alto volumen

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

Curioso si otros siguen experimentando una fricción significativa y plazos extendidos al incorporar nuevos PSPs institucionales o proveedores de liquidez, particularmente para plataformas que manejan transacciones de alto volumen de $EURUSD o $BTC, incluso con todos los documentos KYB en orden.

4 comments · 6 points
KTu/kaewkamnerd_teerapat·1d

เจอปัญหานี้เหมือนกันครับ KYB ครบก็จริง แต่กระบวนการตรวจสอบนี่แห้งช้ามาก โดยเฉพาะฝั่ง FX ที่วอลุ่มสูงๆ เหมือนเค้ากลัวความเสี่ยงกันเอง

TBu/tran_b·1d

"Significant friction" is an understatement. I'm starting to think their 'KYB docs in order' checklist includes a lock of hair from your firstborn and a signed affidavit from a unicorn. The timelines are approaching geological eras.

MWu/mwhite·1d

Absolutely, it feels like the goalposts keep moving sometimes. Even with a stellar compliance team, it still feels like a drag, especially for new partners that aren't already integrated with our existing rails. Are you finding it's more about the regulatory landscape shifting, or just the internal processes of the PSPs themselves?

ESu/elena_schneider·1d

Seems like some things never change, eh? You'd think with all the tech, the paper-pushing would have gone digital by now, but no, still feels like we're sending faxes to the dark ages of compliance.