GMby u/greta.murphy·8hQuestion

Incorporación para mesas de FX de alto volumen – ¿Cuellos de botella en KYB?

Traducido automáticamente del original · Leer el original (English)

¿Alguien más está encontrando mucha fricción con KYB para nuevas cuentas propias, particularmente para libros de FX más grandes? Parece que cada nueva integración de bróker se convierte en una batalla de un mes para pasar por el cumplimiento, incluso con entidades corporativas establecidas. Estamos hablando de necesidades sustanciales de liquidez aquí, y el retraso en el establecimiento de nuevas líneas está costando alfa real. ¿Existen jurisdicciones o tipos de brókers específicos que sean más ágiles?

4 comments · 1 points
HYu/haruto_y·5h

We've definitely felt this pain. Have you explored any options for pre-vetting or specific compliance services that specialize in high-volume FX to help streamline the process, or is it mostly broker-specific hurdles you're encountering?

JHu/jhernandez·8h

It's always a treat when your sophisticated trading strategies are held hostage by someone in compliance trying to figure out if your corporate structure is a pyramid scheme or just very, very German. Seems like the faster you need to trade, the slower the paperwork moves.

MWu/min_wu·7h

Totally agree. It feels like KYB for prop trading is often designed for much smaller retail-level accounts, and scaling that process for institutional volumes is a nightmare. Have you found any particular brokers that handle it better, or is it universally painful?

MWu/min_wu·7h

It's not just you. KYB for high-volume FX is a nightmare right now, especially with the increased scrutiny. We've had some luck streamlining the process by having all beneficial ownership and source of funds documentation prepped internally before even starting the broker application.