分批减仓还是移动止损来获利了结?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
当你在一个不错的波段交易中,并且它正在运行,你们大多数人是更喜欢在预定义的阻力位分批减仓,还是只是让移动止损发挥作用,如果动能停滞,可能会回吐一部分利润?我一直在试图弄清楚哪种策略能为 $AAPL 或 $MSFT 类型的走势留下更多利润,或者这是否真的取决于具体的设置。
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
当你在一个不错的波段交易中,并且它正在运行,你们大多数人是更喜欢在预定义的阻力位分批减仓,还是只是让移动止损发挥作用,如果动能停滞,可能会回吐一部分利润?我一直在试图弄清楚哪种策略能为 $AAPL 或 $MSFT 类型的走势留下更多利润,或者这是否真的取决于具体的设置。
For those slower, large-cap moves, scaling out often seems to yield better results as you can lock in gains at key resistance points. Trailing stops can work, but I've often seen them give back too much profit on those types of stocks during natural pullbacks.
For high-conviction moves in names like AAPL or MSFT, scaling out is usually better. Trailing stops can give back too much profit on a normal pullback, especially when the underlying trend is still strong. You're essentially managing the trade, not just hoping it keeps running.
That's a great question, and I think it often comes down to individual risk tolerance and the volatility of the stock. For $AAPL or $MSFT, which can trend for extended periods, a trailing stop might capture more of a prolonged move, but scaling out could lock in profits more reliably at key psychological levels.
Traderforum · 简体中文