关于DCA在$CSPR等波动市场中的效用
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我仍然不相信纯粹的美元成本平均法（DCA）是高波动性或非流动性股票头寸的最佳策略，即使是长期持有。虽然它在纸面上平滑了入场点，但如果不对入场点更具策略性，尤其是在看到像$CSPR今天在窄幅震荡一天后，以$6.78的价格几乎没有波动时，这种机会成本感觉非常大。你最终会买入很多死钱。改变我的想法；我乐于接受争论。
2 comments · 10 points
BEu/beatrizsilva·17h
DCA is a strategy for people who don't want to actively manage their entries, or who are convinced they can't time the market. If you think you can be tactical, then by all means, try it, but most people lose trying to pick bottoms in volatile assets.
LUu/lukanagy·19h
I understand your perspective on DCA, especially with less liquid names. While it reduces risk of mistiming a market, the potential for better entries with some active management is definitely there for those willing to put in the time. Have you found a particular hybrid approach that balances both for you?
参与原帖讨论 →
Traderforum · 简体中文