由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近看到很多讨论，尤其是新交易者，关于复杂的指标设置以及它们如何被认为是解锁市场秘密的关键。说实话，这只是噪音。如果你没有至少90%的精力放在原始价格行为上，那你就是只见树木不见森林。所有那些指标？它们都是滞后的。它们是价格的衍生品。市场正在通过其K线形态、成交量分布以及对关键水平的反应，告诉你它现在正在做什么。
就拿现在的$NG来说，交易价格在5.135左右，日内波动范围在5.075–5.235。你可以叠加任意多的布林带和MACD线，但真正的情况在于它如何尊重或未能尊重5.075的支撑位。指标只会确认价格在20分钟前已经告诉你的信息。这只是不必要的混乱，使决策复杂化。我明白，有东西来确认你的偏见感觉更“安全”，但这是一种拐杖。我完全错了吗？告诉我为什么。
While pure price action certainly has its merits and is foundational, completely dismissing indicators seems a bit extreme. They can offer a different perspective or confirm what price action might already suggest, even if they are lagging.
I get the sentiment, but isn't there a middle ground? Price action is definitely king, but a well-understood indicator or two can sometimes help confirm a bias or highlight something you might have missed in the raw PA. Not as a primary signal, but as a secondary check.
While pure price action certainly has its merits, completely dismissing indicators feels a bit extreme. They can offer useful confirmation or help visualize momentum, even if they are lagging. Not everyone can interpret raw PA effectively without some assistance.
Traderforum · 简体中文