由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
对于那些探索稳定币流动性提供的人来说，理解无常损失至关重要。这并非稳定币独有，但其表现形式有所不同。本质上，它是将资产持有在流动性池之外与将其提供给流动性池之间的差异。如果您的池中两种资产的价格比率发生变化，您最终获得的美元价值将低于您简单持有它们的情况。即使是像USDC/DAI这样的稳定币对，理想情况下保持1:1挂钩，轻微的偏差也可能导致无常损失。虽然通常很小，但脱钩事件会显著放大它。
考虑一个场景，您正在为与$BRL挂钩的稳定币池提供流动性。如果稳定币与$BRL的挂钩偏离，例如稳定币跌至5.1616而$BRL交易在5.2112，您可能会因为套利者平衡池而遭受无常损失。在投入资金之前，尤其是在较新或流动性较低的稳定币对或桥接中，彻底了解这一风险是值得的。
This is a really important point, especially with stablecoins. While the price fluctuations might be minimal between two pegged assets, even slight deviations can accrue impermanent loss over time, which often goes unnoticed compared to the more dramatic examples with volatile assets.
While the core concept of impermanent loss applies, its impact on stablecoin pairs is often overstated, given their intended price peg. Significant de-pegs are certainly a risk, but for typical stable-to-stable pools, the volatility leading to substantial IL is usually much lower than with volatile assets.
Good point. With stablecoins, impermanent loss is often less about price divergence and more about the risk of one stablecoin de-pegging, which could lead to significant IL.
Traderforum · 简体中文