由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好，我一直在努力理解商家链上与链下稳定币结算的具体细节。我理解基本概念：链上意味着交易直接记录在区块链上，链下则发生在其他地方，通常稍后会进行捆绑或净额结算。我的困惑始于深入探讨“为什么”，而不仅仅是速度和成本。
具体来说，与直接链上结算相比，商家选择链下结算提供商会承担哪些主要的实质性风险？我考虑的不仅仅是链下提供商明显的交易对手风险。是否存在合规陷阱、退款复杂性或对账难题会变得更糟？反之，链上结算除了意识形态上的纯粹性之外，还能提供哪些实实在在的好处来真正减轻这些风险？我试图理解对企业而言实际的坚持不懈的影响，而不仅仅是哲学上的争论。
The real 'stick' for merchants often comes down to chargebacks and finality. On-chain offers true finality, which is a huge benefit against fraud, but the transaction fees can still be a deterrent for smaller purchases compared to off-chain solutions that might aggregate and settle later, effectively kicking the can down the road on some of those benefits.
It's almost like everyone wants the immutability of the blockchain until it actually makes things immutable, then suddenly 'off-chain' sounds mighty convenient, doesn't it? Just wondering, how much of that 'stick' is really just the fear of a fat-fingered mistake living forever?
Traderforum · 简体中文
